Three cutting-edge gaming monitors were unveiled at Computex, each pushing the boundaries of refresh rates. Leading the pack is the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG, a 1080p monitor boasting an astonishing 610Hz refresh rate. Not to be outdone, both MSI and Acer introduced 1440p displays with 500Hz refresh rates—speeds that challenge even the mightiest RTX 5090 equipped with multi-frame generation technology.
Acer's entry, the Predator X27U F5, not only promises speed but also delivers with its QD-OLED display, ensuring exceptional color accuracy. Initially launching in Europe and China at a starting price of €899, the Predator X27U F5 is slated for a future US release. Acer has been tight-lipped about the US pricing, attributing delays to ongoing tariff negotiations with retailers. Given the rising cost of tech in the US, it's unlikely the monitor will come cheap.
Meanwhile, MSI's 27-inch MPG 271QR X50 also features a QD-OLED panel, though pricing remains undisclosed. What sets this monitor apart is its innovative AI feature. As detailed by PC Gamer, a small sensor at the bottom of the display detects when you step away, relaying this information to a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to trigger automatic shut-off, enhancing burn-in protection—a crucial feature for OLED displays, particularly in gaming monitors where static images are common. While the AI aspect may raise some eyebrows, it's a step up from traditional OLED protection that can interrupt gameplay.
The introduction of monitors like the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG with its 610Hz refresh rate is undeniably impressive, yet it begs the question: Do gaming monitors really need to be this fast? At 1080p, achieving 610Hz requires not just an RTX 5090 but also multi-frame generation, which can introduce latency—detrimental in competitive gaming.
To truly benefit from such high refresh rates, you'd need a robust CPU capable of feeding data to the graphics card at these speeds. Technologies like Nvidia Reflex and frame generation can help, but at around 600fps, a powerful CPU becomes essential.
The allure of these high refresh rates lies in their potential to minimize render latency, a critical advantage in competitive gaming. For instance, professional Counter-Strike 2 players prioritize frame rates over graphics, knowing that lower input lag can make all the difference. However, the steep price tag of these cutting-edge monitors raises the question of whether the performance gain justifies the cost for the average gamer.